Indiana Partnership for Statewide Education
Tutorial for IPSE grant applicants
NOTE: The IHETS appropriation for the 2005-07 biennium was reduced by 12 percent in the first year and an additional 20 percent in the second year. In addition, the final version of the 2005-07 state budget included language that explicitly prohibited use of the IHETS appropriation to support the course and module development program. Therefore, we are unable to offer the grant program after the 2004-05 fiscal year.
Contents
Introduction
I. Market Analysis
II. Instructional Design and Delivery Plan
III. Institutional Capacity and Commitment
IV. Utilization Potential
V. Marketing Plan
VI. Evaluation Plan
Introduction
Search the Web and you'll find lots of wonderful resources on how to write successful grant proposals. In fact, you can find some of the best resources right here on the IHETS Web site. Rather than duplicate these efforts, this tutorial is intended to supplement them with information and advice specific to the IHETS/IPSE course and module development grant program. We'll focus on the six sections of the project narrative that will be scored by the proposal review team. At the end of each section, you'll find links to proposals that were rated highly for that section.
Before delving into the details of the project narrative, however, here are a few general recommendations that will help strengthen your proposal:
- Clearly identify the problem(s) you are trying to solve with the project. The online course or module you plan to develop should solve a particular teaching problem or address a specific educational need. Identify this problem or need at the outset of the of the proposal and then use the project narrative to systematically describe how you intend to address the problem or need through your proposed implementation.
- Write for a general audience. The proposal review teams are college and university faculty, administrators, and instructional support staff. You may safely assume that they are bright, well educated people, but you should not assume they understand the intricacies of your teaching/research discipline. When using technical or specialized terminology, provide definitions and explanations that will help the reviewers understand the significance of your project for students and professionals in your field. Remember to ask yourself if somebody outside your field understand your proposal. Could your grandmother understand the proposal?
- Show your enthusiasm for the project. A proposal is an exercise in persuasion. It is your job to convince the reader that your project is important, that your approach is sound, and that you can pull it off successfully.
- Carefully follow the proposal guidelines regarding length and content. Proposal length and content guidelines have been set to ensure fair and equitable evaluations by the proposal review teams. Be sure to include all sections of the proposal narrative and to limit the overall length of the narrative to five single-spaced pages.
- Ask colleagues within and outside your discipline to review your proposal and make revisions based on their feedback. Think of proposal writing as an iterative process. Share your drafts with friends and colleagues and ask for their candid feedback. It's especially useful to get readers from outside of your teaching/research discipline because they will be in a better position to tell you whether the proposal is can be understood by people by non-specialists.
- Read proposals that have been funded in previous years. The full texts of all proposals previously funded through the IHETS/IPSE grant program are available online. Although the emphasis and requirements of the program have changed over the years, the hallmarks of good proposal writing remain constant. Reading a handful of previously funded proposals, particularly those funded in your specific subject area, can be very helpful.
I. Market analysis
Preparing the market analysis is one of the most challenging aspects of proposal development. Most faculty are not market research specialists, nor do they have the time to conduct extensive primary market research in the form of surveys, focus groups, interviews, etc. Instead, you will probably need to rely primarily on secondary sources, such as published articles and reports, demographic studies, online information resources such as virtual university catalogs, as well as anecdotal evidence. Credible, objective evidence is generally rated more highly by reviewers than anecdotal evidence. The specific types of information you will draw upon will depend, in part, on the nature and subject area of your project and the resource available to you.
The market analysis section of your proposal should answer the following questions:
- Why is the course or module needed?
- Who needs it or would benefit from it? (i.e., Who is the target audience?)
- Does the target audience want it and are they willing to pay for it with their tuition dollars and/or their time?
- Is there an easy way to reach out directly to the audience through a targeted marketing campaign?
- Is the same or similar content available elsewhere, and if so, why will your audience choose your offering over your competitors? (Is your competitor unable to meet the demand? Will your course or module represent a qualitative or quantitative improvement over your competitor? etc.)
Useful resources. Most college and university campuses have a department or unit dedicated to distance learning, continuing education, lifelong learning, and similar educational outreach efforts. Before writing the market analysis section of your grant, you may wish to consult with the program development staff in this unit as they are often very knowledgeable about local, regional, and statewide educational needs. Other possible sources of information and expertise are local, state, or federal agencies, businesses or corporations, and professional or service organizations.
Some very useful tools and publications on the topic of market and audience analysis can be found on the Web. You may wish to consult one or more of the following resources before starting the market analysis for your project.
- Purdue Proposal Enhancement Tools, pp. 5-11 (excellent resource for writing effective grant proposals; includes a substantial section on needs and audience analysis)
- Assessing Demand (written to assist with market analysis for new online programs at the University of Illinois)
- Researching Your Market, a publication of the U.S. Small Business Association
- How to Prepare a Market Analysis, article on the Edward Lowe Peerspectives Web site.
Demonstrating need. There are a variety of ways to show that a particular course or module addresses a particular need. The following are potential indicators of need that may be applicable to your project. Be sure to support your argument with supporting evidence, such as articles, reports, original research, statistical data, expert testimony, or other available documentation.
- Documented shortage of professionals possessing particular knowledge, skills, or credential that the course or module will provide.
- Proposed course or module will fulfill certification, licensure, or recertification/continuing education requirements.
- Proposed course or module is integral component of a planned or existing online curriculum for which need and demand have already been established.
- Curricular reform requiring significant revision of a current offering.
- Published or original research documenting the need for a particular segment of the population to know more about the topic covered in the proposed course or module.
- Description of the teaching problem that the course or module will attempt to solve.
- Need for outreach to the general public or a specific segment of the population to disseminate new information, such as breaking research or new state or federal regulations.
Potential predictors of demand. Many people confuse the terms need and demand. In the field of economics, demand is defined as the desire to purchase a product or service combined with the ability to pay for it. There may be cases where there is a clear and demonstrable need for a course or module, but no market demand for a specific implementation. Many factors may influence the personal decision to enroll (purchase) including price, reputation, convenience, priorities, marketing strategy, delivery modality, etc. Providing concrete evidence that the target audience will be strongly motivated to enroll in your offering will greatly strengthen your proposal. Here again, the type of evidence available will depend on the focus of your particular project. Possible sources include:
- Published market research
- Original market research (analysis of data from surveys, focus groups, etc.). It may be possible for you to communicate directly with a representative sample of your target audience through mailing lists of professional organizations, interest groups, alumni from your institutions, current students etc. If so, consider conducting a brief survey or focus group to gauge the level of interest in your offering.
- Competitive analysis. Investigate whether other institutions in Indiana or elsewhere are offering a similar course or module. If so, look for evidence (enrollment data, unmet demand) that the market is big enough to support multiple providers. Determine how you will distinguish yourself from your competitors in order to gain market share.
A good place to begin is the online course and program catalog of the Indiana College Network. From there you may wish to expand your research to include the offerings of other statewide and regional virtual universities. A list of links to other virtual universities is available from the Oregon Network for Education.
Broad market trends in online post-secondary education are reflected in the catalogs of the University of Phoenix, Capella University, and other “for-profit” institutions. As a general rule, for-profit schools only offer online courses and programs in high-demand areas where they know they can attract students. Examine their catalogs to find out what's hot and what's not.
- Admission/enrollment statistics for similar courses offered on-campus, online, or through another college or university.
Describing your target audience. The analysis of the target audience should include at least these three key components:
- Audience profile: A description of any characteristics shared by the target population that are likely to influence their decision to enroll and succeed in the offering. This might include age; gender, ethnicity, educational background; occupation; common needs, values, and interests; geographic distribution; income; work-life situation; computer knowledge access. If there are any secondary audiences, identify them as well. Explain why members of these groups would be motivated to enroll in the course or module. It's also important to demonstrate that there are ways to reach your target audience(s) to let them know that the offering exists (e.g., mailing lists, professional associations, user groups, specialized publications, etc.)
- Estimated size of target audience: Once you've established the common characteristics of your audience, provide an estimate of the size of the target population. Unless you plan to market the offering out of state, the estimate should be limited to Indiana. Possible resources for this sort of information are published studies and reports, census data, enrollment data for similar offerings, etc. A very useful resource for demographic and employment information is the STATS Indiana Web page.
- Estimated annual enrollments: Provide a realistic (conservative) estimate of the number of students who will enroll in the course/module each year as well as an estimate of the minimum enrollments required to make the course/module financially viable.
Proposals with strong market analysis sections
- Child Welfare Distance Education (
PDF)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Gail Folaron
- Online Basic Parish Nurse Education Program (
PDF)
University of Southern Indiana, Nadine Coudret
II. Instructional design and delivery plan
This part of the project narrative, which focuses on the teaching methodology and nature of materials to be developed, is the most heavily weighted of the eight required sections. Logically then, you will probably want to devote more time, thought, and words to this section of the proposal than any other. Try to paint a vivid and detailed picture of the educational experience you hope to create for your students. Explain the various choices you've made regarding delivery technologies, instructional strategies, and the nature of the learning materials and activities you plan to produce, and describe the role each plays in supporting and achieving the instructional goals of the course or module.
If your campus has an instructional support unit with professional instructional designers (instructional design professionals are often employed in centers for teaching and learning [or teaching excellence] and in instructional computing units), you may wish to consult with them while writing your proposal and, if the project is funded, to collaborate with them on the project itself.
Best practices. When evaluating this section of your proposal, the review team will consider the degree your instructional approach reflects commonly-accepted guiding principles and best practices in online instruction, including:
- Clearly articulated learning objectives and performance expectations
- Selection of instructional strategies, activities, materials, and supporting technologies is based on careful audience and instructional analysis
- A learner-centered approach in which the learner has considerable control and involvement in the learning experience, as opposed to the traditional approach in which the instructor dispenses information, usually in the form of a lecture.
- Learning activities that directly and actively engage students in course content (case studies, journal writing, role playing, problem-solving, class discussions, research reports, etc.)
- Opportunities for collaboration
- Frequent and rapid feedback
- Assessment methods directly linked to learning objectives
- Opportunities for student-student and student-instructor interaction along with strategies or specific activities that promote interaction
- Clearly stated expectations
- Presentation of information in small, digestible chunks
- Recognition of and accommodation for different learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic)
If this is the first time you've developed an online course or you are unfamiliar with the practices and principles listed above, there are many books and Web sites that describe their theory and application in great detail. Here are a few resources to get you started:
- IPSE Guiding Principles for Faculty In Distance Learning (section on course design)
- Principles of Online Design (Florida Gulfcoast University)
- Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever (Arthur W. Chickering and Stephen Ehrmann)
- Rubric for Online Instruction (Chico State)
- Field-tested Learning Assessment Guide
- UMUC-Verizon: Virtual Resource Site for Teaching with Technology
- The Virtual Instructional Designer (comprehensive instructional design resource developed at Indiana State)
- Faculty Development 101 (Penn State World Campus; although written for faculty who teach with the World Campus, this self-paced online course contains a wealth of information for anyone interested in teaching online.)
- Online Education Resources: Instructional Design (links to materials developed by the Illinois Online Network and elsewhere)
- Instructional Design Models (links to resources on specific theories and models for instructional design)
Proposals with strong instructional design sections
- Keeping Information Safe: Practices for K-12 Schools (
PDF)
Purdue University, Matt Rose
- English L203 Introduction to Drama (
PDF format)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Helen Schwartz
- Development of Asynchronous Web-Based Learning Modules in Bioinstrumentation and Nanotechnology (
PDF)
Purdue University, Thomas Webster
III. Institutional capacity and commitment
The review committee wants to be sure that the projects funded through this program have a long and successful life. In additional to the time and resources you personally will devote to the project, the committee will look for evidence that your department, college, and institution will stand solidly behind your effort and has the capacity to deliver.
Institutional capacity is the ability to develop and deliver the proposed course along with all of primary and ancillary services required by the target audience. The following are potential indicators of institutional capacity:
- Availability of requisite delivery technologies and infrastructure (server space, courseware and/or course management systems, authoring software, network bandwidth) and corresponding support services
- Availability of online services for enrolled students (access to library resources, online registration)
- Availability of student assistants, instructional design professionals, media specialists, technical consultants to assist with the development process
- Successful track record in delivering similar online offerings
Evidence of institutional commitment can take many forms. Of course, the one of the most obvious is financial support. Your institution must provide at least a 50 percent match of the requested grant amount, but institutional matches above the minimum requirement are a good indicator of institutional commitment. Other potential indicators of institutional commitment are:
- Course or module is part of a larger program to which considerable institutional resource have been devoted
- Course or module addresses department-, college-, and/or institution-wide strategic goals priorities
- Commitment of non-monetary resources to the project
- A commitment to offer the course or module on a regular basis for the next 3-5 years.
- Commitment to reinvest a portion of the tuition revenue from the offering into ongoing revision and maintenance of the course/module content.
Proposals with strong institutional capacity and commitment sections
- Interactive Human Embryology Animation Modules for Medical Students, Medical Professionals and Patients (
PDF)
Indiana University Bloomington, Valerie O'Loughlin
- Clinical Faculty: A New Practice Role (
PDF)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Sharon Vinten
IV. Utilization potential
One of the ways the IHETS/IPSE grant program hopes to leverage its investment is by supporting the development of educational content that can be used in multiple contexts and serve multiple audiences. Use this section of the proposal to describe your ideas and/or specific plans for sharing the content you develop with other faculty and/or repurposing the content for use in other contexts. Here are a few suggestions for how you can increase the utilization potential of your project:
- Use a modular approach when developing learning materials so that some or most of the individual components can be used as independent, stand-alone learning objects.
- Submit your learning materials to MERLOT, a database of online learning materials developed and available for use by college and university faculty
- Collaborate with faculty at other institutions on the development of the course or module with the goal of offering it at all of the collaborating institutions.
- Explore opportunities for parts of the course or module to be repackaged as a noncredit, continuing education offering or for use in a K-12 setting.
- Pursue agreements with other institutions, organizations, or businesses to recommend or offer the course or module to its students or members.
Proposals with strong utilization potential sections
- Child Welfare Distance Education (
PDF)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Gail Folaron
- Development of Asynchronous Web-Based Learning Modules in Bioinstrumentation and Nanotechnology (
PDF)
Purdue University, Thomas Webster
- Interactive Human Embryology Animation Modules for Medical Students, Medical Professionals and Patients (
PDF)
Indiana University Bloomington, Valerie O'Loughlin
V. Marketing plan
Hopefully by now you've identified a need and your target audience. It's time to think about how you are going to promote your offering to your audience. If your project is a regular on-campus course that gets high enrollments every semester, you probably don't need to worry much about marketing. But, if you are creating something entirely new or hoping to attract new students to a traditional offering, you'll need get the word out. The project marketing plan should answer the following questions:
- Who is the target audience?
- How can this specific audience be reached most effectively (direct mail, electronic mailing lists, radio, television, newsletters, newspaper, web, professional associations, word of mouth, etc.)?
- What is the message you hope to convey?
- What particular vehicles (brochure, print/radio/TV advertisement, inclusion in print or online catalogs, personalized letters, Web site) will be used to convey your message and why were they selected?
Before getting started with your plan, find out if the continuing/lifelong education division of your institution has a marketing specialist who can provide advice and assistance with marketing strategies. Since your marketing budget will undoubtedly be modest, try to get your course or module listed in general promotional materials developed by your department or campus in addition to those prepared specifically for your project. Also, be sure to contact the Indiana College Network (ICN) representative at your institution to find out how to get your course or module listed in the ICN online catalog.
Proposals with strong marketing plans
- Child Welfare Distance Education (
PDF)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Gail Folaron
- Online Basic Parish Nurse Education Program (
PDF)
University of Southern Indiana, Nadine Coudret
- FCSMR 235: Introduction to Residential Property Management (
PDF)
Ball State University, Carla Earhart
VI. Evaluation plan
Every project funded through the IHETS/IPSE grant program must include a formal evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation is to help you, the developer/instructor, better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the course or module with the ultimate goal of improving the quality and effectiveness of subsequent offerings. The evaluation can be conducted by the course instructor or by a third party, such as an evaluation and measurement specialist (check with your local center for teaching and learning) or other recognized experts. Grant funds may be used to pay service fees or honoraria paid to the evaluators.The evaluation plan provides a framework for conducting research on the effectiveness of your course or module and should answer two key questions:
- What aspects of the course or module do you plan to evaluate? It's not practical to conduct a systematic evaluation of each and every detail of the course, so you'll need to decide which areas will yield the most useful information. Here's a list of the more commonly studied characteristics of online courses:
- Quantity and quality of interaction
- Quality of instruction
- Overall student satisfaction
- Satisfaction relative to F2F instruction or another online course
- Interface usability
- Relevance of the course content
- Satisfaction with instructional pacing
- Clarity of directions provided by the instructor
- Effectiveness of specific online learning activities and materials (online discussion, lecture, homework assignments, etc.)
- Satisfaction with group/collaborative assignments
- Receptiveness to the technology used in the course
- What method(s) will you use to gather, analyze, and interpret data for the evaluation? The specific methods you choose will depend, in part, on what you hope to evaluate. Possible data collection methods include:
- Student questionnaires (formative and/or summative)
- Focus groups
- Interviews
- Observations
- Standardized testing
- Reviews by experts
For additional information on developing an evaluation strategy, consult these excellent online resources:
- Evaluation Handbook (Judith Wilde, PhD and Suzanne Sockey, PhD)
- User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations
- Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation (peer-reviewed electronic journal)
- NJIT/Sloan-C Learning Networks Effectiveness Research (articles, tutorials, research studies, sample survey questionnaires, etc. all specifically focused on evaluating online teaching and learning)
- Online Education Resources: Assessment and Evaluation Topics (links to materials developed by the Illinois Online Network and elsewhere)
- Assessment Articles in the Technology Source
Proposals with strong evaluation plans
- Clinical Faculty: A New Practice Role (
PDF)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Sharon Vinten
- Certificate in Distance Education Advanced Modules (
PDF)
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Henry Merrill
- ECT 421 Circuit Analysis by Calculus (
PDF)
Indiana State University, Donald Kaufman
